Auction of Government of India Dated SecuritiesOverseas Direct Investment for September 2026LOK SABHA SPEAKER URGES BRICS PARLIAMENTS TO CHAMPION ETHICAL, RESPONSIBLE, AND TRANSPARENT TECHNOLOGY WITH PARAMOUNT HUMAN OVERSIGHTPrime Minister interacts with MPs from BRICS nations during the 12th BRICS Parliamentary Forum in New DelhiGovernor of Telangana Shri Shiv Pratap Shukla meets the Prime MinisterAuction of Government of India Dated SecuritiesOverseas Direct Investment for September 2026LOK SABHA SPEAKER URGES BRICS PARLIAMENTS TO CHAMPION ETHICAL, RESPONSIBLE, AND TRANSPARENT TECHNOLOGY WITH PARAMOUNT HUMAN OVERSIGHTPrime Minister interacts with MPs from BRICS nations during the 12th BRICS Parliamentary Forum in New DelhiGovernor of Telangana Shri Shiv Pratap Shukla meets the Prime Minister

Supreme Court · 2017 · (2017) 10 SCC 1

Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v. Union of India

W.P. (Civil) No. 494 of 2012

Parties: Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) and another v. Union of India and others

Decision: 24 August 2017

Bench: J.S. Khehar CJI, J. Chelameswar J., S.A. Bobde J., R.K. Agrawal J., R.F. Nariman J., A.M. Sapre J., D.Y. Chandrachud J., S.K. Kaul J., S. Abdul Nazeer J.

Plain-language summary

A nine-judge Constitution Bench unanimously held that privacy is a fundamental right protected as part of liberty and dignity under the Constitution, including under Article 21 and the freedoms guaranteed by Part III.

Key holdings

  • Privacy is a constitutionally protected fundamental right.
  • Privacy includes bodily, informational and decisional autonomy.
  • The right is not absolute and restrictions require a valid legal basis and constitutional justification.
  • Earlier decisions denying a constitutional privacy right were overruled to that extent.

Official judgment

This summary is informational. Read and cite the court’s judgment for the authoritative text.

Supreme Court Reports — official judgment
constitutional lawarticle 21right to privacyfundamental rights